Selective policing
On the 13th March 2023, a video was posted on TikTok that claimed I am the paedophile Alan Herbert Delaney.
This is totally untrue, and I have provided proof of this.
When I reported the malicious lies that were being spread about me to the police, they took no action.
In the above photo, a black and white photo of the paedophile Alan Herbert Delaney (left hand photo) has been placed next to two old colour photos of me.
The picture of Mr. Delaney was probably taken from this news article.
Dyfed-Powys Police have used the same photo as seen in the paedophile allegation in a wanted notice that they issued.
A different version of the Dyfed-Powys wanted notice has been issued. At the bottom of the notice the photos have a copyright notice that reads:
"© Photo - Ammanford and Cross Hands Police."
If the photos in the Ammanford and Cross Hands notice are compared with the photos that were used in the attempt to make me look like a paedophile, the photos are the same.
There is one noticeable difference: the photos in the police wanted notice are sharper.
In all of the photos, I am wearing the same clothes and I have the same hairstyle. The background is the same in all the photos, and so is the size of the border.
In my opinion, it is far more likely the anonymous video used photos from the police.
Here's my reasoning:
Investigation and Evidence Chain:
Police agencies, especially for a wanted notice, work from an evidence file. The original, high‑quality (sharp) photos would be part of their investigative material. It is highly improbable that a police department would source the primary image for an official wanted notice from an unverified, anonymous, and defamatory internet video. Their protocol would require using original evidence.
The Sharpness Difference:
The fact that the police photos are "sharper" is a major clue. This is consistent with the police having the original, higher‑quality image file.
Timeline (2013 vs. 2025):
While the video predates the notice, this does not mean the photos originated with the video. The police may have had the photos in their system for years prior to 2023.
The Critical Underlying Issue
The alarming link is that the same two specific photos appear in both a defamatory video and an official police notice. This suggests a dangerous connection between the malicious campaign against me.
Summary:
The most logical technical and procedural assessment is that the anonymous video used photos that originated from an official/police source. The profound significance is the established connection between a malicious defamation campaign and a formal police action.
A police force who have repeatedly taken no action when I reported the video.
Although the reference number can be clearly seen in the email of PC Hart he chose to ignore it
I reported the matter again to police in 2025, and when I was not contacted by the police, I emailed them again.
Ref: DP-2025129-269
Dear Sir or Madam,
I have not been contacted by the police regarding this matter. The same happened in 2023 when I first reported this matter.
This led to my wife and I being attacked on three separate occasions.
Please see the attached screenshots. Not only is that untrue notice still on the internet, I have recordings of a man phoning paedophile hunters and informing them about it.
Then I noticed that the exact same photos have been used by Ammanford and Cross Hands police in a wanted notice that states that I am wanted in connection with a harassment offence.
I have attached a screenshot of the notice.
I request that the police look into this matter as it puts my wife and I in serious risk of danger.
When I reported this matter in 2023 the officer who did nothing about it was PC Hart. I respectfully ask that this matter is passed to a different officer.
This was the reply I received:
Hi Alan,
This has been forwarded on to the relevant officer.
Regards,