The false vendetta allegations
Gareth Edwards and Jane John – exposing a narrative that does not hold up to evidence
Gareth Edwards and Jane John: Exposing their false vendetta narrative
Who they are
Gareth Edwards and his sister Jane John are co‑owners of the shop premises at 20 College Street, Ammanford. Despite repeated contact, neither has ever shown any concern, empathy, or even curiosity regarding the disturbing noises I recorded.
Their allegation – the "vendetta"
Gareth Edwards claims that my reason for naming him and his sister in my investigation is a personal vendetta. According to him, this vendetta stems from my dissatisfaction with a property I allegedly bought from them, and from a court case in which I supposedly lost a substantial amount of money.
The facts – property purchase
I did not buy the property from Gareth or Jane. It was purchased at a public auction; the vendor was Mr. Alan Davies. This is confirmed by the Land Registry copy of the title deed and the auction catalogue shown below.
This can be seen in the Land Registry copy.
Land registry – copy of title deed (PDF)
The facts – court case
In the civil case between us, I was awarded £3,750. Gareth and Jane made several counterclaims against me; they received 1 penny.
The court transcript can be read here.
The court transcript (PDF)
Gareth emailed me after the court case.
It was Gareth and Jane that incurred a substantial financial loss that day.
My response – no vendetta, only an invitation to talk
I do not hold a vendetta against Gareth or his sister. I have contacted both of them by Royal Mail, formally inviting them to give their point of view regarding the noises recorded beneath my former home.
Neither has engaged in good faith; instead they have repeated the "vendetta" narrative.
The police dimension – a cover‑up?
Jane once told me that she had "friends in the police". Are the officers she was referring to the same ones who are actively trying to secure a conviction against me for harassment?
Officers from the same force have falsely claimed that I suffer from mental health issues – a classic tactic used to discredit whistleblowers and silence those who expose uncomfortable truths.
I put these officers to absolute proof of any allegations that they might make.
Selective policing – a wider pattern
While I am subjected to a vendetta smear and baseless harassment investigations, individuals with actual criminal convictions face no such attention.
One example is Simon Griffiths, who was convicted in 2024 for supplying cannabis. His name appears repeatedly in the online abuse directed at me, yet he is treated as a victim.
This selective approach strongly suggests that police resources are being used to protect certain individuals rather than to investigate serious crime.
Conclusion – the vendetta claim is disproven
The documentary evidence – auction record, Land Registry title, court judgment, settlement, and Gareth's own email – proves that I neither bought the property from them nor "lost" money in court.
Their allegation is false.
The vendetta narrative is a fabrication, promoted by fake accounts and perhaps endorsed by officers who should be impartial.
I ask that this section be read as part of my formal complaint against both the individuals named.
The vendetta narrative has also been promoted by others, one person that promoted this false narrative was another one of the people that I have named, Mr. Simon Griffiths.
Others include:
